News Articles
 Jun 12, 2008 10:41 AM Sedo Introduces "Auto -Select Best Layout"
 Jun 2, 2008 11:53 AM You and .ME
 May 12, 2008 10:44 AM The .Car is Getting Ready for the Road
 Dec 11, 2007 12:23 PM Basics of Overture Scores for Domain Names
 Nov 3, 2007 6:25 PM Marketing Your Website: Domain Names 101
 Oct 6, 2007 12:34 PM What's in 74,000 names? Big money
 Sep 12, 2007 1:07 PM How to Start Your .mobi Online Presence Immediately
 Aug 9, 2006 11:31 AM Registrar on .eu domain hoarding: Nothing we can do
 Jun 20, 2007 10:49 AM Sedo Acquires Industry Pioneer, GreatDomains
 Jun 6, 2006 1:16 PM Sedo Offers Financing for High-Value Domains
 Mar 14, 2005 1:06 PM How to Find Money-Making Domains
 Feb 13, 2005 5:11 PM SEO for Dummies- A crash course in Search Engine Optimization
 Feb 1, 2005 5:54 PM Google Becomes Domain Registrar
 Jan 11, 2005 5:23 PM .DE Rules the Roost in Deutschland
 Dec 31, 2004 8:53 AM Recycled-Traffic.com domain monetization case studies
 Nov 10, 2004 1:32 PM Domain Registry of America (DRoA) SCAM!
 Oct 9, 2004 1:45 PM Domain Owners protest eNom's registration of 1 million .info's
 Jul 31, 2004 3:10 PM Avoid Being Blacklisted By The Search Engines
 Jun 21, 2004 8:25 PM Sedo Slashes Domain Commission Fees 50%
 Apr 8, 2004 10:22 AM Sedo's Ascent: How the German Juggernaut Became A Global Giant
 Mar 19, 2004 6:33 PM Recycled-traffic.V2 released!
 Mar 8, 2004 8:26 AM Domain Registrars Sue ICANN and VeriSign
 Mar 3, 2004 7:42 PM Expired Domain Tips And Tricks -Part One-
 Feb 27, 2004 1:04 AM New Web Auction Site Means Less link Begging
 Feb 18, 2004 7:15 PM Yahoo! Birth of a New Machine
 Jan 29, 2004 12:12 AM Take the Test: Ten Signs of "Mad Domain" Disease
 Jan 28, 2004 5:11 PM Google NEWS - THE HILLTOP ALGORITHM...
 Dec 14, 2003 9:31 PM Review – DRAMS 4.0 Domain Registration Software
 Nov 23, 2003 8:30 PM Are Hyphenated Domain Names A Good Buy?
 Oct 3, 2003 3:10 PM VERISIGN LOSES SITEFINDER
 Sep 15, 2003 6:00 PM VeriSign Eyes Valuable 'Junk' Traffic
 May 20, 2003 8:19 PM Expiry dates for .uk domains to be published
 Apr 20, 2003 8:08 PM US congress criminalizes "porn-napping"
 Mar 20, 2003 5:17 PM Earn money from your unused domain names!
 Feb 22, 2003 7:51 PM Domain Redemption Period Farce Exposed!
 Dec 20, 2002 7:23 PM .ORG transition to PIR (Public Interest Registry)
 Nov 13, 2002 1:13 PM Verisign's WLS (waiting list service) looms closer
 Sep 18, 2002 4:04 PM Buy 1 get 1 Free Domains!
 Jun 14, 2002 11:00 AM Free Expired Domain Name Search
 Jun 21, 2002 2:05 PM Recycled-Traffic strikes up new partnerships
 Jun 13, 2002 2:48 PM How Search Engines Look at Links
 May 25, 2002 12:00 AM Top Ranking in 24 hours!
 May 3, 2002 11:59 AM Verisign, Register.com Bear brunt of domain drain
 Apr 27, 2002 12:00 AM VeriSign shares plunge 46 percent
 Apr 2, 2002 12:00 AM LookSmart Changing To Cost-Per-Click Basis
 Apr 1, 2002 12:00 AM Recycled-Traffic is up for preview
 Jul 26, 2000 1:13 PM Network Solutions hoarding expired domains |
|  | March 8, 2004 8:26 AM Domain Registrars Sue ICANN and VeriSign
March 8th, 2004
By Robert McMillan
Just a day after being sued by VeriSign Inc. over delays in approving a new service for back-ordering Internet domain names, ICANN, the organization that controls the Internet's Domain Name System, found itself being sued by a group of eight domain-name registrars seeking to stop the new service's implementation. And this time, VeriSign was named as a co-defendant.
The lawsuit, filed Feb. 27 in the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, seeks to halt the implementation of a VeriSign-backed waiting list for expired domain names called Wait Listing Service (WLS).
The suit accuses VeriSign and the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, the nonprofit organization responsible for allocating IP address space and managing top-level domains, of "planning to implement a scheme to dupe consumers into buying domain names the consumers will never be able to register, and an unlawful and fraudulent protection racket."
Back-Ordered Domains
Popular domain names are often back-ordered and then auctioned when they become available again. According to Bill Mushkin, CEO of Name.com LLC, one of the registrars behind the lawsuit, while customers may pay a relatively high fee for a back-ordered domain -- which, on average, costs $30 to $60 -- they pay for the domains only when they actually obtain them.
Under the WLS system, back-ordered domains would be awarded on a first-come, first-served basis, but customers would pay an annual fee to back-order the domain, regardless of whether it became available for purchase during the year, Mushkin said.
ICANN failed to return calls seeking comment by press time.
While VeriSign declined to comment directly on the suit, citing company policy against discussing ongoing litigation, Tom Galvin, VeriSign's vice president of government relations, defended the WLS system, saying it would help remove the uncertainty involved in back-ordering domain names.
Galvin said he hopes WLS could soon be implemented. "We've been working on this service for over two years, and we hope, either in Rome or sometime shortly after that, to reach a solution," he said, referring to ICANN's meetings there this week.
|